All the benefits of circumcision should be available to all – not just the lucky ones,A Parent’s Decision,pro circumcision,baby boy,baby boys,balanitis,brian j morris,circumcise,circumcised,circumcision,circumcision benefits,circumcision problems,circumcision ethics,circumcision methods,circumcision myths,circumcision facts,circumcision styles,circumplast,cancer of the penis,cut,exposed glans,foreskin,foreskins,frenulum,glans,gomco clamp,high and tight,low and loose,masturbate,masturbation,mogen clamp,Parent's Decision,pee,penis,penises,posthisis,phimosis,plastibell,sex,shaft,smegma,son,standard style circumcision,styles of circumcision,the circumplast,uncircumcised,uncut,urinate,willy,willies
CONTRAST THAT LIST OF BENEFITS WITH THE PROBLEMS OF AN UNCIRCUMCISED PENIS
WITH THAT IN MIND, HERE ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT POINTS I WISH TO GET ACROSS
A Circumcised Penis Feels So Nice
Your Son Does Not Need A Foreskin
My Personal View Of Circumcision
Is Circumcision On The Decline? Lies and Statistics
The Best Thing About Being Circumcised That You Never Realised
When Should You Attempt To Retract His Foreskin?
Not Circumcised? Retract Your Foreskin Before You Start To Pee
Having A Pee Is Problem Free -
Do You Suffer From BBS?
(Bashful Bladder Syndrome)
Just Diagnosed With Diabetes? Consider Circumcision
Things You May Not Know About Circumcision
Sex and Circumcision
Other Boys’ Penises
I am at great pains to dispel the gross untruths perpetrated by the anti-
You need to be aware of some of the untruths:
You may like to read this selection of articles/reports on the subject of circumcision on the AAP website (all links opening in a new window):
New Evidence Points to Greater Benefits of Infant Circumcision, But Final Say is Still Up to Parents, Says AAP
Dated: 27 August 2012
New scientific evidence shows the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks of the procedure, but the benefits are not great enough to recommend routine circumcision for all newborn boys, according to an updated policy statement published by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). The revised policy, like the previous one from the AAP, says the decision whether or not to circumcise should be left to the parents in consultation with their child’s doctor.
The and accompanying from the AAP will be published in the September 2012 issue of Pediatrics (published online Monday, Aug. 27). The documents update the previous policy that the AAP published in 1999 and reaffirmed in 2005.
Dated: 27 August 2012
The American Academy of Pediatrics found the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks, but the benefits are not great enough to recommend universal newborn circumcision.
This short article carries further informative links.
Dated: 31 October 2012
This report summarizes Periodic Survey #37 on pediatricians' practices and beliefs on circumcision of healthy newborn males.
Dated: 31 October 2012
Recent research has rekindled the debate on circumcision's role in halting the spread of HIV and sexually transmitted infections.
Another thing you will notice if you visit any anti-
Also absent from anti-
Sex is always portrayed as being ruined if you've been circumcised. Nothing could be further from the truth. Numerous surveys and studies have confirmed that couples where the man is circumcised have sex more often, it lasts longer and is considered more enjoyable by both partners. Indeed, if your man is circumcised, you are 35% more likely to have an orgasm, than your unlucky uncircumcised friends. If sex really was ruined by being circumcised, then virtually all Americans would be condemned to second rate sex.
The findings are accepted by doctors worldwide and the WHO (World Heath Organisation) received a Nobel Prize for the research.
Another worrying thing for the lobbyists is that the AAP (American Association of Paediatricians) have recently come out in favour of routine infant circumcision in their latest pronouncement. The lobbyists have long made capital out of the fact that The AAP has never endorsed routine infant circumcision. Neither have they been against it. The lobbyists always conveniently ignore that important point. Up till now the panel has not consisted of doctors, but of administrators. Most doctors in the US have despaired that their views have not been represented.
These are just a few of the anomalies you will find on many anti-